@@@@@ @   @ @@@@@    @     @ @@@@@@@   @       @  @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@
         @   @   @ @        @ @ @ @    @       @     @   @   @   @   @  @
         @   @@@@@ @@@@     @  @  @    @        @   @    @   @   @   @   @
         @   @   @ @        @     @    @         @ @     @   @   @   @  @
         @   @   @ @@@@@    @     @    @          @      @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@

                        Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
                    Club Notice - 02/19/99 -- Vol. 17, No. 34

       MT Chair/Librarian:
                     Mark Leeper   MT 3E-433  732-957-5619 mleeper@lucent.com
       HO Chair:     John Jetzt    MT 2E-530  732-957-5087 jetzt@lucent.com
       HO Librarian: Nick Sauer    HO 4F-427  732-949-7076 njs@lucent.com
       Distinguished Heinlein Apologist:
                     Rob Mitchell  MT 2E-537  732-957-6330 robmitchell@lucent.com
       Factotum:     Evelyn Leeper MT 3E-433  732-957-2070 eleeper@lucent.com
       Back issues at http://www.geocities.com/Athens/4824
       All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

       The Science Fiction Association of Bergen County meets on the
       second Saturday of every month in Upper Saddle River; call
       201-447-3652 for details.  The New Jersey Science Fiction Society
       meets irregularly; call 201-652-0534 for details, or check
       http://www.interactive.net/~kat/njsfs.html.  The Denver Area
       Science Fiction Association meets 7:30 PM on the third Saturday of
       every month at Southwest State Bank, 1380 S. Federal Blvd.

       1. Well, guys, it is all starting to  happen.   As  the  Millennium
       approaches   the   world  is  just  getting  weirder  and  weirder.
       Admittedly, we knew that some of the serious problems we  would  be
       facing  at  the  end  of  the century would be the stuff of science
       fiction.  Famine.  Nuclear weapons.  That sort of thing.  But  some
       of  the  world  is  getting to look like some of the more whimsical
       pieces also.  This one is worthy of an episode of the old "X  Minus
       One"  radio  show.  For some of you this is going to sound like old
       news and for the rest, you are going to  think  I  am  crazy.   Our
       National  Security  Agency  has  a new problem, a new threat to the
       security of the country.  It seems that a potential security hazard
       has  been  found  inside  their  own  building.  The source of this
       hazard is people bringing to work Furbies.  Furbies, you may  know,
       have  gone into millions of unsuspecting homes.  But they have also
       been adopted by adults who have taken them to work.  They have gone
       to  places that would have known better than to let a child in, but
       people figure a doll is safe.  They are  cute  little  furry  dolls
       that  look  a lot like the title characters in GREMLINS.  They also
       may behave like the title characters in GREMLINS.   It  seems  that
       this  is sort of a little mechanical pet that is just chock full of
       computer chips so that it acts like a child.  What all does a Furby
       do?   The  manufacturer  is  not  giving  a  complete  list  of its
       capabilities.  That is the idea.  The thing is supposed  to  be  as
       unpredictable  as  a child is.  You don't know all the weird things
       that a child can do and you are pretty much in  the  same  position
       with  a  Furby.   You  never  know where you stand.  If you put two
       Furbies together they will start talking with each other  in  their
       own language.  Sometimes they sing little duets.  Or they may start
       discussing you.  Or they might discuss something you said.  And  if
       you  happen  to  have  said  it  some  place like the NSA it may be
       something that was a national secret.  Until the  Furby  heard  it.
       Now you see why the NSA is scared.

       It seems that one of the surprise capabilities of  a  Furby  is  to
       listen to the world around it and keep mum for a while, but to talk
       about it later.  They pick up words  and  use  them  in  their  own
       conversations.   Honest.   They  have  a  little recorder on a chip
       inside them and they remember a lot of what they  hear.   And  then
       later  they  will repeat what they have heard.  Are you starting to
       see why the NSA might be very nervous  about  them?   Furbies  have
       been  brought  into  their  building  and  now  have  been privy to
       national secrets.  You would never let a child  into  such  meeting
       for  fear  of what the child might repeat, but nobody thought twice
       about letting a little inanimate doll sit  in  on  these  meetings.
       Well,  perhaps  it was not so inanimate.  Of a memory, a voice, and
       discretion, which do you think is the hardest to give a doll?   Let
       us  just  say  that  these fur and metal beasties currently have at
       best the lessor part of valor.

       Now the big problem is what to do with the Furbies that  have  been
       found  in  the  NSA building.  In some cases it will be possible to
       know that Furbies know something they should not.  I mean when  you
       hear  a  toy  doll talking about our deployment of operative abroad
       you generally know that he is guilty of  a  security  breach.   And
       being  that  there  are  few people to stand up for Furby rights, I
       think the openly indiscrete Furby is probably dispatched  with  the
       utmost  barbarity.  The problem is what do you do about a Furby who
       just sits that with an enigmatic smile on its little  pelted  puss.
       Does  it  know  about  the  assassins we hired in Paraguay for that
       all-important job?  It may look innocent enough, but can you afford
       to  take  that  risk?  How do you know that once you release it, it
       will not go  straight  to  the  newspapers?   NSA  General  Counsel
       Stewart  Baker told the Washington Post: "Getting them out is going
       to be almost harder than getting them in. You'd have to  take  them
       to  the  basement  and  sweat  them a lot."  And who knows what the
       circuitry is.  Put electrodes on one to get the truth out of it and
       you  may  just change his circuitry.  Who knows what it would do if
       it wants revenge?

       Now raise your hands.  How many of you out there  figured  that  by
       the  end  of  the century we would have a problem with toy dolls in
       the NSA possibly spying and revealing national secrets?  I just how
       that this guy Baker has them locked up good and tight.  How does he
       know they won't stage an escape?  [-mrl]

       ===================================================================

       2. COSM by Gregory Benford (Avon Books, 1998,  ISBN  0-380-97435-5,
       HC, 344 pp., $23.00) (book review by Joe Karpierz)

       Well, it's nearing Hugo nominations time again, soon to be followed
       by  the  Hugo balloting itself.  When the balloting rolls around, I
       end up looking at the nominations list only to find out  that  most
       of the books are ones that I've not read.  It seems that the tastes
       of the typical Hugo nominators and mine just don't agree.

       The annual LOCUS "Year in Review" issue arrived at the  house  last
       week.   Within it are LOCUS's recommendations for the best in every
       Hugo category--their "Recommended Reading List".  And again, I look
       at  the lists, and see that the books that I liked and read are not
       among the selections.

       Until, I hope, now.  LOCUS recommends it highly.  I do too.   COSM,
       by Gregory Benford.  Benford draws on his experience as a real life
       physicist in coming up with one of the best novels I've  read  that
       were published in 1998.  Alicia Butterworth is a UC-Irvine particle
       physics professor doing experiments in high energy physics  on  the
       Relatavistic  Heavy  Ion  Collider  (RHIC)  at  Brookhaven National
       Laboratory.  The experiment goes wrong (come now, you shouldn't  be
       surprised at *that*), and there is a massive explosion.  As she and
       others clear away the rubble,  she  finds  a  silver  bowling  ball
       shaped  object.  Reasoning that it was her experiment, and that the
       folks at Brookhaven wouldn't do the  right  thing,  she  steals  it
       away,  unbeknownst to them (for the meantime, anyway), back to UCI.
       There, she and a couple of her assistants, as well as  a  professor
       from Caltech, Max Jalon, make an amazing discovery:  what they have
       there is a whole new universe.

       The story, then, follows Alicia as she tries to deal with the Cosm,
       the  publicity  it  brings, the death of one of the assistants, the
       budding romance with Jalon, the legal problems of walking off  with
       the  Cosm,  the philosophical ramifications of creating a universe,
       and being single and feeling out of touch  with  her  feelings  and
       emotions.  Benford very effectively weaves the human element of the
       characters in with the hard science of just what this thing  really
       is  to  tell  a Really Neat Story.  The only problem I had with the
       story was that, as much as I like hard  sf  stories,  and  hard  sf
       written  by Benford, the physics was a little tough for me to grasp
       in some instances.

       But that can be dismissed, I think, as one looks  deeper  into  the
       implications of just what it means to have created a universe, and,
       in Alicia's  case,  one  that  seems  to  behave  just  like  ours.
       Brookhaven  created  another  one  by  attempting  to duplicate her
       experiments conditions,  but  the  universe  created  didn't  quite
       behave  the  same  way.   In  any case, should we be creating these
       things, and what about the life forms within  them,  if  any?   Are
       *we*  living  in  a  Cosm,  as  it  were?   Did somebody create our
       universe, not God, or god, or gods, but some  scientist  just  like
       Alicia in some (un)controlled laboratory experiment?  And does that
       make that scientist (G)(g)od?

       The book comes to, I think, a satisfying and reasonable conclusion.
       While after a while that conclusion really was predictable, it made
       sense.  Read the book, and I think you'll agree.

       Actually, read the book, and I hope you'll agree it was terrific.

       Now,  where's  that  recommended  reading   list???    Better   get
       started....  [-jak]

                                          Mark Leeper
                                          MT 3E-433 732-957-5619
                                          mleeper@lucent.com

            Marriage is an arrangement by which two people start
            by getting the best out of each other and often end
            by getting the worst.
                                          -- Gerard Brenan